The recent visit to Australia by U.S. President Barack Obama, the APEC meeting in Honolulu and the East Asia Summit in Bali all overshadowed a meeting in November of an extraordinary international organisation of 19 states from Asia, Africa and Oceania.
Officials from the countries, who gathered in Bengaluru, India, are united by their common interests in sharing the world’s third-largest ocean. Yet with the aphabet soup of regional bodies that now exists, few have heard of the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation (or its unpronounceable acronym of IOR-ARC), despite it being more than a decade old.
The Assocation’s membership of Indian Ocean littoral states includes Australia, Iran, India, Madagascar, the United Arab Emirates, Yemen and 13 other states large and small. Yet so far, the Assocation, which has a secretariat in Mauritius, has been largely moribund.
Could this be about to change? India has now taken over as chair of the Association for two years, with Australia assuming the role of vice chair, before chairing the group in 2013 and 2014. That’s sensible: Australia is the largest Indian Ocean state in terms of area of maritime jurisdiction. Indonesia will chair the group after Australia’s term expires.
There’s no doubt the Association has enormous potential. The countries of the Indian Ocean rim, with a population of about 2.5 billion, make it an attractive market. And it’s also a huge energy and trade maritime highway, particularly for the booming economies of Asia – it carries half of the world’s container ships, one third of the bulk cargo traffic and two thirds of the world’s oil shipments.
Looking ahead, key components of the Association’s roadmap include trade liberalization and trade and investment facilitation. Intra-regional trade amounts to 24 percent of global trade, and is increasing, although intra-regional investment flows are modest.
But perhaps as important as the economics is the fact that the Indian Ocean is where key geo-political differences will play out between the rising powers of India and China.It’s with the potential for the tensions that this could spark in mind that the Association should work to build a common approach toward sharing resources and expertise over fisheries, maritime transport, marine research (this is the least studied of the world’s oceans) and disaster management.There’s also real potential for cooperation in science and technology, agriculture and culture.
Unfortunately, the range of interests – and the wide differences in national capabilities of the Assocation’s members – will make cooperation difficult.Still, the IOR-ARC would do well to embrace all littoral states, including Pakistan and big external users such as China, the United States and Japan. Only through a fully inclusive mechanism can competition be translated into co-operation.
The group’s recent meeting made some progress, with members agreeing to share information on piracy and ways of consolidating co-operation in education, marine resources management, trade and investment promotion, as well as tourism. But as a state with growing Indian Ocean economic and security interests, and as vice chair of the IOR-ARC, Australia would be well advised to push harder to try and breathe new life into these efforts.
If these 19 states can start working together, the results could be extremely worthwhile for everyone involved. They could perhaps even start by coming up with a more user friendly name.
Anthony Bergin is Director of Research Programs at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute and co-author of 'Our Western Front: Australia and the Indian Ocean.'








yang zi
Please don’t kid yourself. There are so many country groups now that it is not even funny. The key country in Indian ocean is Indonesia, not Austrialia or India.
Sam
Why do you always bring indonesia in when no one even talks about it ?
Czar
haha…”Indian” Ocean, it is my friend…and did you just say India is not a major country…You seem to be propping up Indonesia unnecessarily…You are the only one who appears to be kidding yourself here…
yang zi
Only because Indonesia can influence Malaca strait, controls the only other water way between Indian and Pacific ocean – Lomok strait.
Indian doesn’t control any such thing, nor Austrialia. India is a major country, but its geoposition in Indian ocean is not important as Indonesia. A strong navy from Pakistan, Srilanka will greatly tip its navy power balance. A strong Pakistan navy is a real possibility.
You should look at this by thinking what if Indonesia has the same navy power as India? Who is more important ? Then you can make a right conclusion of which country is more important.
Indonesia is twice as rich as India. It is also a one trillion dollar economy. If it wants, it can build a navy on par with India’s.
JohnX
If they build on trade between themselves then they may not even need the malaca straits.
Therefore what strenght does Indonesia truly hold Yang zi?
JohnX
For struths sake mate, Yang zi.
To get from the Pacific Ocean to the Indian Ocean you need to go through the malaca Straits?
I can think of two different routes that could be followed if needed and one of those Australia actually controls.
yang zi
JohnX, you can self important as you wish. China is only concerned its maritime lifeline. Of the waterway you mentioned that is controlled by Astrialia, I rather think Indonesia controls it.
Actually, nobody controls anything, only US can claim they controls these waterways. China is a distance second, rest just day dreaming. Japan has some capabilities, but it can only do US’s bidding, so consider it US capability.
But looking at the future, if Indonesia rises, it is more important than Austrialia and India. It might be an anchor to a pan muslim revival. India ocean becomes an ocean of Muslim dominance.
Historically Muslim civilization has reached heights, it will do so in this century. The malaysia and turkey model is attractive and successful. Indonesia is following it (hopefully).
Girish
@yang zi
Indonacia total defense budget (for military,Navy & Air-force) as on 2012 is $7.5 billion. Indian “Navy’s” defence budget alone is $12 billion (and total defence budget is $37 billion). Also Indonesia defence budget is 3% of its GDP where as India’s budget is 1.9%.
Defense capability is not determined by per capita income but financial power to build, invest in R&D and buy defense equipment. With your logic, Chinese must not move with their heads down if per-capita income is going to determine militarty power.
To talk about Indian Navy capabilities, just an example for you, India already operate an aircraf carrier and going to add two additional aircarft carrier in next 4 years. One is already ready to be delivered next year from Russia and 40,000 tone indigenous aircraft carrier in under construction in India. Not to forget its navel fleet size and nuclear sub going to be added with few years.
Only fools can ignore Indian Navy in Indian ocean. And what did you said? Pakistan or Srilankan navy? you must be kidding as always. And by the way Srilankan navy supports India. don;t fool urself. And Pakistan, we don;t care about them as they don’t care about them-self either.
yang zi
You shouldnt look at the static facts that can change. You can’t change the geography, geographically, Indonesia is more important than India.
3% of Indonesia spending is $24billion, not 7.
Anno Domini
Man indonesia is on the edge of the Indian ocean and it is not the only nation along the Malacca strait. Singapore has a better navy. Technically Indonesia is the geographically at the worst possible place. Between the Giants like China & India. Everyone one knows when the elephants cause a stampede it is the ants who get crushed. And no one even cares for them anyhow.
Yang zi
Indian civilization suffered assault from Islamic civilization. As I understand, if not for British brutal killings, India would be dominated by muslims.
China remains largely uninfluenced by the spread of Islam thanks in no small part to hinduism and tibetan buddhism. I have to admit that Vietnam is a staunch ally of China in stopping the spread of Islam. Our cousins in south are as tough as nail, but unfortunately caught up with a fight with China on SCS. I don’t mind make concessions, but Vietnam need to be realistic.
The most impressive country in ASEAN is Malaysia, it made work a country with diverse population. China should learn from it.
yang zi
Smart phD candidates and professional yappers should pay attention to what I am saying, there is a big book here can make you both money and fame.
playdrum
Anthony Bergin is to be commended for his brutally honest assessment of the lack thereof and the potential for cooperation amongst Asia, Africa and Oceania.
The regions when looked at from the middle of the Indian Ocean (the high seas – nobody owns it) forms the most populous landmass where every country including Indonesia, India, Australia, are dependant on the ocean for their propserity and economic growth.
No where in the blog has it been suggested it is about India or Australia or Indonesia. Should one read carefully, I think the author is trying to suggest there is great opportunity for the countries of the Indian Ocean with the chair of the regional grouping to be rotated between India, Australia and Indonesia over the next few years.
No one country has the resources or the capacity to go alone in harnessing the wealth of this great ocean, which is possibly more than the economies of all countries combined.
Commentators would do well to have a discussion on co-operation not competition – bane of author’s blog.
Girish
@yangi zi
What is Indonasia’s defense budget as per you?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesian_National_Armed_Forces
yang zi
Girsh, I know Indonesia is not spending much on military, it only spends 0.9 percent of its GDP. If it spends at 3%, and most of it to near sea navies, it would be much more important than Indian in Indian ocean.
Indonesia can just invest on some cruisers, submairanes, missile boats and corvette, it will instantly become the focus.
This is how should you look at geopositions. If Indonesia spends half of what India spends on navy, it will be more important than India in Indian ocean.
yang zi
Indian ocean was dominated by Islam for centuries before western power came along. It will be dominated again by Islam in the future.
I am not anti Islam. I think the moderate Islam is a constructive force. In terms of Indian ocean, Austrialia is a marginal power, it is only as important as US is using it. India is a transitory power, it wouldn’t be strong enough to challenge US in Indian ocean, when it is strong enough,Muslim powers around Indian Ocean are already strong enough to dominate the ocean economically and militarily.
One trend is happening is that free trade aggreement between Muslim countries. As these countries adopt more enlightened economic policies, the Islam civilization can reach its former heights again.
Shree
(Mr/Mrs)yang zi (sorry i cant distinguish sex from chinese names)..
I agree Indian civilization suffered assault from Islamic civilization but you are missing a the all important point here,India always resisted radicalization by Islam and more than that India accepted them into their diversified culture….china cant even dare to dream to achieve that.
Want the hell do you mean by saying Indian Navy is transitory power?
It is fourth largest in the world and with its ever growing acquisitions its power will increase exponentially .
And what the hell do you know about Islam ..there are more muslim population in India than pak ,almost equal to Indonesia and they live in harmony.
And what do you mean India cant challenge US .. we dont want to or have any reason to do that.. china is the one who is beefing up in an effort NOT to challenge US but just have a slight chance if US challenges it.All India wants to do is contain china and this can be done if Strait of Malacca is blocked .
JohnX
Yang Zi wrote: “JohnX, you can self important as you wish. China is only concerned its maritime lifeline.”
Who do you speak for when you post on here?
JohnX
Yang zi wrote: “Of the waterway you mentioned that is controlled by Astrialia, I rather think Indonesia controls it.”
The Malaca straits is considered important because it is a chokepoint. The most narrow point of land to sea.
The area that I am thinking of is the most narrow point of land of sea is between PNG and Australia. The Australians agreement that was made in 1975 allowed them control up to 1 km off the PNG coast. (Man, I hate that they made the agreement).
Thus Indonesia doesn’t even enter the equation, unless you are stating that they are invading PNG or Australia.
yang zi
1km? I have no idea Aussies are so mean, to hear Aussies talking about SCS, I thought they are most fair of them all