Incumbent Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou has been reelected, taking a comfortable but reduced margin of 51 percent of the vote, compared to 45 percent for the Democratic People's Party, while his Nationalist Party took a majority of 64 of the 113 seats in the island's parliament. The defeat of the pro-independence opposition paty appears to be an endorsement of the island's increasingly close ties to the mainland, and will be counted as a victory by Beijing, which has strongly supported Ma's Nationalist Party.
Ma is claiming a mandate to pursue closer ties with the mainland after an election campaign that focussed heavily on cross-strait relations, warning that electing the DPP could threaten a crisis in relations with Beijing.
But Taiwan Think Tank director I-Chung Lai told me in an interview that Taiwan's relationship with the mainland is unlikely to change much in the next four years. Ma's margin of victory was reduced from 58 perecent in previous elections, while his party lost 13 seats in parliament. Lai pointed to fears that economic integration will eventually undermine Taiwan's political autonomy.
More importantly, Lai said, China's leadership transition will end the possiblity of serious negotiations after July this year. As a new president, Xi Jinping will need several years to establish his authority – a period during which Chinese leaders are usually unable to make the concessions Ma will need to sell a new agreement in Taiwan. Current President Hu Jintao passed China's Anti-Secession Law in the same period, which promises the use of force if Taiwan declares independence.
Lai argued that a DPP victory would have made little difference to relations with Beijing. Presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen had promised to abide by existing agreements, including the One China Policy. Communist Party leaders, Lai said, had prepared to work with a DPP president, opening party-to-party relations with the DPP and strengthening its non-political contacts in Taiwan.
While Beijing is undoubtedly pleased by the results, it remains uneasy with the prospect of free elections happening in a Chinese society. Apparently fearing democratic contagion, the Globe and Mail reports, mainland group tour operators were ordered to confine siteseers to their hotels on election day. Official media studiously downplayed election news – as Ma declared victory, the top story in Xinhua's Taiwan news section was about the birth of a Formosan serow (Chinese link) to a pair of the goat-like creatures presented by Taiwan to a Shandong zoo in April, although the People's Daily quickly published an editorial congratulating Ma.
While the mainland loomed large over the campaign, it has avoided the appearance of direct interference, instead working through networks of friendly politicians and businessmen, avoiding the direct threats it made during previous campaigns.
The last two weeks of the campaign were marked by allegations of American interference, as a former U.S. enjoy told Taiwanese television that the White House would “breathe a sigh of relief” if Ma were reelected. A late December change in administrative rules that allows Taiwanese citizens visa-free entry to the U.S. gave Ma an opportunity to boast of his foreign policy skills, leading to accusations that the Obama adminstration was seeking to interfere in the elections.
Support for Taiwanese autonomy has been up for debate in the American foreign policy community in recent years. A growing number of analysts argue that pushing Taiwan into unification with the mainland would serve U.S. interests, highlighted by a November New York Times opinion article that suggested "selling" Taiwan to China in return for debt forgiveness. The administration denied Ma's request to purchase state-of-the-art American fighters in November, instead offering upgrades to Taiwan's current fleet of previous-generation jets.
Reunificiation is still a very long way off. The Nationalists have downplayed their official “one China” stance as it has lost popularity. Ma has refused to visit the mainland unless he can do so as President of the Republic of China, a concession to Taiwanese legitimacy that Beijing is unwilling to make. Recent polls have found that some 70 percent of people in Taiwan don't consider themselves Chinese. The United States is committed to defending Taiwan's present autonomy by the Taiwan Relations Act.








Sivispace
I hope for the sake of the native Taiwanese People that Taiwan remains free and independent. China has been pushing the rest of Asia around for thousands of years. I hope the Chinese people will likewise be free. The Communist Party has little if any credibility if it came to free elections. The People of China have a rich culture and history. I sincerely hope they can free to realize their destiny.
hey
Why single out native Taiwanese?! the aboriginals only account for 2%-3%!!
Now, I whish EVERYONE to be safe, and that the Republic of China be restored.
yang zi
thanks for the wish, but who is the native Taiwanese?
the native Taiwanese are only a small part of Taiwan population.
This election in Taiwan has settled Taiwan problem forever! that is the 92 consensus. Taiwan doesn’t want to antagonize mainland, and also want to be left alone with their free elections, this will lay the permanent foundation for the peace across strait.
This achievement can be attributed to Hu JinTao. So he is not completely incompetent.
US should and already have given up Taiwan as a tool to balance China (it can still sell arms to Taiwan and China can tolerate that). The stability across Taiwan strait is in the interest of US and Japan. Legally, US has no excuse to interfere with Taiwan’s return to China. A stable, peaceful bounding between Taiwan and China is all but determined.
I’ve said many times, China will democratize when its GDP per capita reaches $10k. this sets the time at between 2020-2030.
mok tuk
The Lion has awaken, so will be the ethnic tribes in mainland, there might be uprising against central communist control policy, like former CCCP or Chou dynasty era, unless freeing, getting rid of certain ethnic’s time bombs, Tibet, Uighurs,etc. because CCP,CCCP & any dictatorship policy could not force their free will forever!
John Chan
@mok tuk,
Taiwan and China have the same freedom and both governments are elected with terms. Unless you admitted Taiwan government is a dictatorship then there is no dictatorship in either China or Taiwan.
Tom Tran
Chan: which planet do you live in? being a mouthpiece of the CCP is nothing wrong on your part, but refusing to see the fact straight is NOT what was told by your boss. China never looks at freedom as what being viewed by the rest of the world. I don’t care if there is historical/political purpose for doing so, but at least the difference is there that everyone can see, but you.
John Chan
@Tom Tran,
I believe you are familiar with the story “The Emperor’s New Clothes,” please tell me is everybody in the kingdom right or just the litter girl is right.
It seems you are one of the grownups of the kingdom of “The Emperor’s New Clothes.”
John Chan
@Sivispace,
Both Chinese in China and Taiwan are free and independent; but people living in India are indeed sad, they live in an inhumane caste society that abuse human beings by birth, they were exploited mercilessly as serfs, they even lost the right to overthrow the corrupted ruling high caste, because the greedy and morally bankrupt high caste claims they have a free election for them, which they can sell their votes for bowl of rice on the election day.
Taking care people’s wellbeing is more important than a symbolic voting motion; India should look after its 800 million poor instead of doing something that neither can fill their stomach nor to provide a roof over their heads.
Cyrus14
Here you are again saying nonsense. China is never free, Taiwan is Free. India is a vibrant Democracy and they outlawed the Caste System already.
what
The only “native” taiwanese are the aboriginal people on taiwan, whom comprises of 2% of the population, the rest are Chinese.
By your logic, Australians of European decent are “native” Australians.
SCdad07
With Ma’s victory, I look forward for increasing cross-strait cooperation on energy exploration, like Tai Chao Project between CPC and CNOOC.
Caseyorourke
John, the very idea of complete freedom in China is a farce and you know it.
Ever since Mao seized power in 1949, China has been an autocratic state where the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is the only legitimate political entity to hold office in the country. I have read where you and others try to say that China has other political parties, but if you look closely at them, the heads of these parties are CCP members who make sure that the leadership of the CCP is acknowledged as supreme. Even if any of these people are elected, it is never above village or local level and even then they are usually used in an advisory role. Any administrative or policy making positions are filled by CCP members. When your so-called elections occur the only candidates allowed to stand are the ones deemed suitable by the CCP.
Taiwan, like the US and any other truly democratic country has a myriad of political parties who are completely independent of each other, have their own agendas and would reject any attempts by the larger parties to dictate their policies.
The Chinese people only enjoy freedom as long as it doesn’t impinge on the sovereignty and prerogatives of the CCP. Anyone who calls those prerogatives into question or criticizes the authority of the party is ostracized, isolated or arrested (Ai Weiwei & Chen Guangcheng). Any foreigners who criticize the government are routinely denied visas (Brad Pitt & David Thewlis). Any news stories, blogs forums or tweets that are deemed critical of the CCP in the Chinese social media (Renren & Weibo) are quickly deleted unless it is sent to users outside of China who can then repost it worldwide. Facebook, Twitter and YouTube are completely blocked by the Chinese government because they see them as a threat to their control of information. Now in the west we have no such controls on social media. President Obama, Congress and the rest of the government are routinely criticized in the news, blogs forum entries or tweets. If President Hu were to be criticized the same way Obama has been, those posts would be removed and the author would be sent to a reeducation camp so fast no one would even know what happened.
So don’t sit there and smugly say China is as free a country as Taiwan when the facts clearly say otherwise
Caseyorourke
I might also add to the list of Chinese citizens who have been been imprisoned, detained or harassed…
1. Gao Zhisheng, a lawyer who has defended some of China’s most vulnerable groups including Christians and coal miners, has been held largely incommunicado since his arrest in February 2009.
2. Nobel peace prize winner Lu Xibao who is was sentenced to 11 years in prison for subversion because he had the audacity to publish a petition for democratic reforms in China.
3. Yu Jie, a writer who published a biography critical of premeir Wen Jibao was beaten and forbidden to publish or practice his religion (a protestant church not authorized by the Chinese government)eventually fleeing in exile to the US.
So again your idea of freedom and the est of the worlds is 180 degrees opposite one another.