Through the first half of next year, the National People’s Congress is in the process of electing new members to ‘endorse’ the new Chinese government in 2013.
The electoral process started here in Beijing in the middle of last month, and I’m glad to have the chance to be a voter. This isn’t my first election, but I haven’t had the chance to vote in a poll since I was still at university, almost 10 years ago. I remember back then my teacher organizing us into groups to vote in the school hall. Our voting slips were prepared for us beforehand and were sent to each individual.
There were two candidates back then, both of whom were teachers at the school. However, I wasn’t in either of their classes, so didn’t really know much about them. They didn’t give any public speeches, and they didn’t have any contact with us as candidates. As a result, we didn’t understand what benefits they might bring, so students simply wrote one of their names down on the ballot so that they could go play football or whatever other activity they wanted to get back to. I remember some students even decided who to vote for by tossing a coin.
After graduating, there was another election, but I don’t remember taking part in that, or even being notified to vote. I think the fact that I can’t really remember anything about it is a reflection of how most Chinese back then felt about elections.
Today, though, China is quite different. I have friends who have become ‘independent’ candidates – a huge step forward in China’s democracy. The desire of people to run also underscores the heightened awareness among Chinese of the electoral process.
Registration began on September 15 and ran until this weekend. All registered residents of Beijing over the age of 18 can opt to vote, as well as some from outside Beijing who have lived in the capital for a certain number of years (although such voters must state where they have come from, and their registration can be cancelled if they’ve registered to vote there, too).
There are several places where people can register to vote. The most common place being is a local government office, although it’s also possible to register at work or school. I chose the former.
A few weeks back, I was watching TV at home when there was a knock at my door. On my doorstep were two elderly women who handed me a red leaflet outlining the significance of participating in the election. One of them asked about where I was registered to vote, while the other one asked for some personal details. They asked me to fill out my address, name and contact telephone number. This information will be checked before a voter card and instructions on where I should vote are issued.
The two women were very enthusiastic about the election, telling me I should vote because it’s my democratic right. They told me they’d be visiting every household in the district to urge them to vote, and I have to say I thought it was encouraging to see such dedication out of office hours.
But I am also a little confused.
People in other countries usually know something about who they will be voting for, such as where the candidate stands on certain issues, and what they are promising to do. The problem here is that even though I’ve registered, I still don’t know anything about the candidates.
Actually, I raised this point with the two women who came to my house, to which one of them replied: ‘We don’t know who the candidates are either, but you’ll find out when it comes to voting. You can vote for who you want, every candidate is the same.’
Such views are typical among that generation – as long as it’s a Chinese Communist Party candidate, everyone is apparently the same. The problem is, we’re in the 21st century, and society has changed tremendously. People’s beliefs have changed from 50 years ago. If elections remain only superficially democratic, they’ve lost their meaning.
Of course, these two women were only doing what they were instructed to do by their superiors – they’re not really interested in who actually gets elected.
Still, I’ve been waiting for my voter card. My vote may be insignificant now, but I hope that eventually, it will count toward China’s future.








yang zi
Thank you Mr. Mu for this. Very interesting. the two woman should be applauded. I am wondering where they are coming from.
These are right steps to democracy. even though you are electing pre-selected candidates, you can try to pick the one you like. i understand campaign is not allowed? they should at least allow a debate.
SCdad07
Layers of mountains in ten of thousands:
The journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step.
Kat
I can’t decide if this is progress or not since it could trick people into thinking that they’re actually participating in a representative democracy. If you are completely uninformed, then do you really have a choice? “You can vote for who you want, every candidate is the same,” essentially means that the decision has already been made, it’s just that now people feel like they got a say in the matter (when, in fact, they did not).
Godfree Roberts
Reminds me of the USA. There’s really only one party (the capitalist party) and it doesn’t make any difference which candidate I vote for…
a_canadian_observer
Very nice saying….
Every election is a single step…
One day you’ll get there…
All the best.
David
Lol…”You can vote for who you want, every candidate is the same.”
Who said Chinese people don’t understand democracy, seems like they understand it just fine!
jeff forsythe
The cruel Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is being written about by writers who appear to have no idea how brutal it has been and is.
Meanwhile, most Western journalists are ignoring these heinous acts and are writing silly stories such as this one.
The Western World should not be dealing with the CCP but is doing so because of corporate greed. America has forgotten the human rights issues that it used to cherish. This is my understanding, thank you.
jyotirmoy chopra
that’s unbelievable,u r not knowing a candidate who will actually decide your future for his next elected term,amazing…..it’s all superficial.
Huang
It might be better not mentioning about Democracy or elections in China. Democracy or other yet to be named political structures develop and grow over time and ONLY possible under one cricial element-and thats STABILITY. Examples can be seen from all Western nations. They are all socially stable and economically sound(of course,there are some problems at this time as seen in some Western democracies).
The Chinese Socialism model is curently the best structure uniquely fitting the large population,vast geographical land mass,and a complex social and economic foundation. With sustained stability and sound economic plannings, what ever politics prevalent in China will be the one that works and is right on track.
Democracy, like other everyday items, does neccessarily fit everyone’s needs or size. Democracy might be the guiding principle for one social structure, and it can also be responsible for derailing otherwise correct approaches in another social environment.
P.S. There are advantages and dis-advantages even for Democracy. There are also suitable and not so suitable for the application of voting to determine any likely candidates. In essence, it is NOt a “One size fit all”. Remember That!
Huang
Although elections at some village levels are somewhat common these days, a nationwide election in China will NOT be realized nor practically feasible for China’s uniquely complex and multi-faceted social and economic struture or nature.
“Socialism with Chinese Characteristics” will remain to be the only guiding post for China’s developnments far into the future since other alternatives are not yet proven to be the right approaches.
Besides, political structures are meant to serve the function of governances-peace,harmony,stability,social progress,laws and order,and social coherence. Hence, some people keep a pet cat for companion while others raise cats to control the mice in their grain storage. The Chinese cat(Socialism)is kept for its performance and duty not its colors,beauty,or shapes.
Reason
@Huang
So by your logic… as soon as this “Chinese Cat” stops performing it’s time to string it up?
Hmmmmm, that’s a lot of pressure for the CCP Fat-cats
Seeing as every complex system on the planet goes through expansion and contraction my money is on the “Chinese system” eventually running out of steam and contracting. When this happens in a democracy it’s time to get a new government – let’s see if the CCP fat-cats will go so easily – or decide to take the whole country into chaos once again – and of course blame the West and not itself.
To keep the cat analogy going, I’d say the CCP fat cats are on lives 7 or 8 out of 9. So not too many to go before they run out of lives and luck and dump on China.
The Chinese population will have only themselves to blame as another dynasty crumbles into oblivion…. but of course, they’ll blame everyone else for the mess instead and start afresh on exactly the same racket that has been running in China for millennia.
Ground Hog Day anyone?
Huang
@reason,
If that is your wish, then thats all yours to keep on wishing.
The Chinese don’t normally wish other people ills and we don’t care too much about others who wish mis-fortunes to China either. We know deep down that wishing and reality don’t follow one another. Nevertherless, we also have seen more than enough the consequences faced by people lazy-ing around wishing others bad luck.
Its NOT karma as interpreted in religions, its merely a logical and realistic outcome of be stupid and lazy at the same.
P.S. I don’t think it is fair to you to wish you good luck. I think it is fair to you if I tell you to “lighten-up” and get a life. It fun and meaningful.
a_canadian_observer
@Huang:
“@reason,
If that is your wish, then thats all yours to keep on wishing.
The Chinese don’t normally wish other people ills” Did the chinese not jump for joy after the 9-11 incident in NY?
” and we don’t care too much about others who wish mis-fortunes to China either.” Give me a break. Just some criticizing of china already arms up the chinese, let alone mis-fortune wishes.
Huang
@a-canadian-observer,
The 9/11/01. highjacks and subsequent destructions to the Twin towers in Downtown New York City and the damages to the US Pentagon were tragic incidents where many lives were lost and many hearts were broken. If there were any expressions of joys or celebrations captured on camaras was INDEED INSENSITIVE and NOT WISE on the part of those present at that location. Did most of all the Chinese feel or think the same toward someone else’s tragedies ? The answer is definitely NO and I can confidently assuming that the country you represent would be the same too.
You can bring up any un-wise or any lack of sensibilities some people in China have,but it would wrong to make an assertion demonizing the whole nation for a few people’s actions.
Similarly, I can’t hold any judgement on the country your identify with base on your lack of truthfulness on some of your posts because it would be wrong and unfair to others who happened to be condemning your very acts.
Finally, I still prefer substance over hastes and emotionally shaped statements containing no arguable elements from some bloggers who happen to be irritated by my un-conventional ideas and opinions.
a_canadian_observer
@Huang: I apologize for generalizing. And I agree that not all chinese jumped for joy. But there was a huge number that did so, if you consider those that have access to the news in one way or another. A lot of those didn’t care what happened, and a very small number had some sympathy.
nirvana
>>”The Chinese cat(Socialism)is kept for its performance and duty not its colors,beauty,or shapes” (Huang Blogger).
At least if Chinese Socialism is a cat, one could agree with Mr Deng that its color is irrelevant. But it does not catch a single mouse. It even invites the 850,000 millionaire rats, of which the 128 billionaires hyenas to feast on the outcome of the work of the other Chinese. China is a unique country to hold a double record: a failed Socialism building from 1949 to 1976, and afterwards, a champion of predatory Capitalism building.
One “characteristic” that contributed to this “achievement”, that China’s state has kept since 1949, is the state propaganda. Painting a very rosy picture to the mass while the reality is an abysmal catastrophy. For example:
http://chineseposters.net/themes/great-leap-forward-2.php
In a contest of the longest nose nation, China would the easy winner.
Another “characteristic” is the repressive system. When some “minority” Chinese want to speak the truth, they are either crushed by tanks, thrown in prisons without public trial or, if they are extremely lucky as comrade Zhao Ziyang, they are muzzled under house arrest. Who could be brave enough to defend the “minority” interest? The interest of 650 millions Chinese earning less than 2$/day so that the “majority” super rich can speculate with sub-prime loans and on increasing military spending to fulfill “China’s Dream”?
In a contest of nations practicing most brutal “man exploiting man”, China would be on the podium.
@Mu, there is still an option for you to use your citizen right: cast a blank ballot in the urn.
Huang
@nirvana,
Impressive and very detail oriented coupled with some sources presumably found on most Western data-bases. If your assertions were all precise,true,and un-corrupted, I think the Chinese would be more than happy to learn more about since they will be useful in making corrections and preventing un-neccessary wrongs from happening in the first.
Unfortunately, the bulk of what was in your statements were emotionally expressed and that you have over-shoot the runway into the swarmpy and mired in rants and with no credible substance.
Only the truths will stand the test of criticisms and time itself. Anybody with grievances based on sentimental and emotional natures against China for some odd or justifiable reasons can make up these ridiculous remarks and included there rants with sources meant to mis-inform the in-experience reader or want-to-be(what? I don’t care.)in the first place.
Finally, your post this time around is fully of words,but have to substance. I am sorry to let you know about it.
Each day we live, we learn- and there is no such thing as knowing too much. Nevertherless, learning and absorbing the right stuffs required an open mind and a stable conscience. Lack any one of the above is as good as talking nonsense.
P.S. Negative ramarks with convincing truths is worth something. Uncontrolable rants with no substance is as good as the person himself or herself.
nirvana
@Huang,
I think you are reacting without doing a research. Here are a few links about the widening income inequality in China reaching “alarming” level:
http://www.peopleforum.cn/viewthread.php?tid=10523
http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/666788/Voice-on-Chinas-income-distribution-reform.aspx
I suggest that you look into the statistics compiled by the World Bank too, on China, Taiwan, the US, South Africa etc…. There are many good “stuffs” to learn in there about the rich and the poor. And please give your version of how many Chinese millionaires are holding powerful positions either in the CPC or the NPC. Give your TRUTHS instead if you want to rebut mine.
Huang
@nirvana,
I don’t think I will furnish any links or sources to support any of my comments–its not fair to those readers(mostly silently reading and never join the discussions)who can always tell what is true like a rock and what is illusions some bloggers believed they can fool around with facts(even facts are not always 100% true-they only represent the mostle likely or believable truths large number of people honestly holding as credible).
You won’t find any links from any of my posts because everything I wrote were based on what I know and believe to be most likely true.
P.S. I am not joining this discussion to show-off how much or what I know nor do I want to pretend to be someone else in some prestigious professions the way some naive bloggers often did on this site.
a_canadian_observer
@Huang: That’s the difference between nirvana and you: facts (which is common in our free society) vs none.
Cultural Imperialist
@huang
Thank you for one of the funniest comments I’ve read in weeks. :)
SCdad07
@nirvana:
$2/day – the ‘damn’ vietnam people would love to get above that level.
The 3 clans control vietnam for millennium.
US thanked the Japanese for pearl.
Japan thanked US for the 2 wake up calls.
Phil thanked Spain and US for being great teachers and they left.
VN thanked China, France and US as the ‘cross toe’ people come to taste civilization.
VN will thank China again.