Last week, the big Internet talking point in China was an incident involving a student hurling shoes at Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications Principal Fang Binxing as he was delivering a speech at Wuhan University.
Fang is known as the Father of the Great Firewall, and is understood to have been instrumental in the creation and implementation of the technology behind China’s tough Internet restrictions. As a result, the student who threw the shoes was quickly hailed by netizens as a hero of Internet freedom in China.
Of course, as the authorities moved quickly to quash discussion of the incident, there are several versions of what happened. However, one colleague of mine who has followed events closely gave me this version of events:
On 19 May, Fang visited Wuhan University under tight security. While he was delivering a speech, a student known as an active Tweeter threw two shoes at Fang, one of which struck him. The student later Tweeted that he not only wanted to throw shoes, but also an egg. In fact, I’m told that he tried to do so after Fang alighted from his car, but the egg missed its target.
Despite the official efforts to stifle discussion, other students managed to get some information out about the incident. The student who threw the shoes apparently left the building barefoot, with his peers left behind taking pictures of the shoes involved. After it happened, several police cars are said to have arrived, and the vice president of Wuhan University is also believed to have rushed to the scene to restore order.
The student who threw the shoes posted on Twitter that police were looking for him, but he added that he wasn’t worried, and called on the world to exert more pressure on Fang for the restrictions he helped impose.
Although Fang is introduced on his official home page as a leading scientist from the Chinese Academy of Engineering, and the chairman of China Network and Information Security Committee, many netizens have expressed discomfort with his ‘research’ fields, accusing him of engaging in politics and not technology.
Fang has openly voiced pleasure at his nickname of Great Firewall father, and has said that the scale of the country’s internet censorship network should actually be boosted. He launched his own micro-blog last year, but it soon came under attack from netizens and hasn’t been updated since.
My personal experience is that network controls have become more stringent, especially with China having established numerous specialized agencies to control the Web. Previously, some sensitive sites could still be accessed through proxy servers and virtual private networks, but this is becoming increasingly difficult.
This implies that China’s Internet censorship technology is becoming more sophisticated, and that the government’s wish to maintain domestic stability is becoming more pronounced. Clearly, China’s desire to prevent its citizens being exposed to alternative views is getting stronger.
Still, the shoe throwing incident underscores something else—that shutting the country off from the outside world won’t bring stability, but will instead foster more severe social divides and deeper conflict.








James Kennedy
This is no surprise.
What kind of person would cut a single sentence from a newspaper and pass it to a hundred friends? As I keep saying, the brain of a Twitter addict is wired to re-hash short, unjustified hearsay. Twitter fosters a souped-up version of “Chinese whispers” and harms anyone who uses it. Prolific Tweeter Ai Weiwei and his clique of radicalized Twitter addicts illustrate my point: 神经病.
Old Fang is a scapegoat for Twitter-addict dissenters to vent their frustration in China. American coropration Cisco actually created the Great Firewall, and Huawei (a Chinese version of Cisco) took over the Firewall’s management a few years ago: it’s not entirely Fang’s invention. (Huawei now also routes 3G traffic for the Orange cellular networks in Europe!)
Read: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/05/23/ap/business/main20065514.shtml
The Firewall is a respectable effort. Show me something on Twitter, Facebook or Youtube that’s healthy for a country’s development (or a person’s, for that matter). Post links here please.
Leonard R.
James Kennedy wrote:
“Old Fang is a scapegoat for Twitter-addict dissenters to vent their frustration in China. American coropration Cisco actually created the Great Firewall, and Huawei (a Chinese version of Cisco) took over the Firewall’s management a few years ago: it’s not entirely Fang’s invention. (Huawei now also routes 3G traffic for the Orange cellular networks in Europe!)”
***
This is a good point. To what extent are Western corporations and governments culpable for the threat the they now face from China. To what extent are they in collusion with the CCP? And if they don’t object to suppressing speech in China, why would they object to suppressing it in their home countries?
Marx wrote. “The last capitalist we hang shall be the one who sold us the rope.”
The CCP is more up on Marx than western leaders. Sadly, they seem more familiar with Adam Smith too.
guest
Since China is buying US T-bonds and effectively funding the US defense budget, I’ll say that “The last communist we hang shall be the one who lent us the money for the rope.”
John Chan
@Leonard R, you sounds like defeatist, I don’t think the predatory West is losing ground; the majority of CCP rank and file have been acculturated by the capitalist greed and immorality. Since the majority CCP rank and file have turned capitalist in substance, so “The last capitalist we hang shall be the one who sold us the rope.” may actually put the noose on the necks of those newly minted capitalists if they don’t clean up their corruption and immoral behaviour.
Mu Chunshan
China’s firewall, not only makes people in mainland not login to Twitter, Youtube, Facebook and other social networking sites, but also monitors Google, Blogspot websites sometimes, as well as Taiwan’s news site will be blocked, which made people feel unsafe and uncomfortable.
Yes, China’s firewall system is a huge and systematic project, and Fang is part of it. But he is not a scapegoat; he has over-enthusiasm about the work. Maybe the energetic man is more active than Huawei,because his all fame has been bound up with the Firewall.
Jack Daniels
What’s going on in Inner Mongolia?
John Chan
Buy a copy of Singtao daily, or any Chinese newspaper, there was pageful of things you wanted to know.
James Kennedy
There was a hit-and-run incident in Inner Mongolia. Normal. Two Han drivers killed a Mongolian “herder” (according to the Chinese press). Normal. Ethnic Mongolians took to the streets in an organized protest on at least one occasion. Normal.
This incident has been given special treatment by the Western press because: (a) June 4th is approaching. Even though June 4th is not connected in any way with the recent hit-and-run incident, Western journalists make it so. (b) The drivers were Han and the herder was ethnically Mongolian. It’s therefore easy to be deluded (by induction) that the incident represents a wider ethnic feud. “Mongol Invaders Meet 1989-Style Suppression” sells better than “Normal Car Crash on Normal Day” as a news story.
Hit-and-run incidents happen every day. Large protests also happen every day. But by adding “ethnic” and “1989″ to their stories, Western journalists can turn a relatively boring event into a sensationalist one.
Jack Daniels
Thanks for the info guys, I appreciate it…
James Kennedy
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/china-business/8583482/Huawei-Chinas-best-kept-secret.html
This new article in The Telegraph explains everything I said about Huawei in my comment.