If Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou had hoped for a boost in his poll ratings with a landmark economic deal meant to boost the island’s economy, then he’ll likely have been disappointed with a recent opinion survey posted on his party’s website.
In June, Ma pushed through the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) with China, which he claimed was essential for Taiwan’s future growth prospects and would help meet his pledge to lead the island into a ‘golden decade.’
But according to a Global Views magazine opinion poll last month, trust in the ruling party has continued to fall—from 47.7 last September in the magazine’s Ruling Side Trust Index, to 43.6 (and down a point since the ECFA was signed). Over the same period, political optimism has fallen even faster, from 56.3 to 45.4.
What’s really interesting about this poll, though, is the swing in the figure measuring how relaxed Taiwanese feel about cross-Strait relations. Just over a year ago, optimism over cross-Strait relations stood at 64.4. But this figure had dipped to 56.4 by last month. The biggest fall came between July and September of this year, when there was an almost five point fall.
The figures appear to reflect in part suspicion of the mainland’s government, with exactly a third having a positive impression, compared with more than half who have a bad impression. When asked specifically what word they would use to describe the Chinese government, the most popular response was ‘autocratic’, offered by 20 percent of respondents, followed by ‘tyrannical’ at 17 percent; only 4 percent described it as ‘friendly’.
This will also be something of a blow to Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, who will no doubt hope that the mainland’s recent more moderate rhetoric over the hundreds of missiles pointed at Taiwan will have reassured a bit about the mainland’s intentions.
Speaking in New York last month, Wen suggested that the missiles could be removed at some point. Channel News Asia quoted him as saying: ‘I believe the issue you mention will eventually be realised.’
The comment was quickly welcomed, unsurprisingly, by Ma’s office, with one senior official quoted as saying: ‘It is a sign of goodwill from Beijing, evidence of the peaceful and steady development of bilateral ties and something we are glad to see.’
The China Post also noted:
‘Premier Wu Den-yih expressed a similar opinion at the Legislative Yuan earlier in the day before giving a report on his administration's agenda.
‘“We believe the remark is a gesture of goodwill and we hope that it (the removal) can be done as soon as possible,’ Wu said.
‘“The withdrawal of the missiles will not neutralize all the threat facing Taiwan, but it is a most specific sign of goodwill.”’
All this said, though, the KMT probably shouldn’t get too excited about such a statement—after all, the word ‘eventually’ is hardly particularly committal. And earlier this week, a senior Taiwanese official reportedly told a US defence forum that although commercial ties were improving, the military threat from China is growing stronger.
AP reported:
‘Deputy Defense Minister Andrew Yang told a U.S.-Taiwan Business Council meeting in Maryland on Monday that despite considerable progress on commercial ties, the mainland is continuing to deploy more and more sophisticated weapons against the island, according to reports Tuesday from opposition and pro-government newspapers and the government-owned Central News Agency.
‘Taiwan's Defense Ministry said it couldn't confirm Yang's remarks.
‘The media outlets quoted Yang as saying that China has never renounced its threats to attack Taiwan, and that its anti-Taiwanese military posture is at odds with the recent signing of a landmark trade deal between the sides.’
The reasons for the concern, and the plunge in cross-Strait confidence between July and September, aren’t all that hard to fathom. Although China made its claim to vast parts of the South China Sea earlier this year, the issue really gained international attention—and focused minds on China’s expansive claim—from July.
The summer then saw a flurry of reports and commentary (including at The Diplomat) on China’s growing territorial assertiveness, something that’s hardly likely to have endeared it to Taiwanese, nor reassured them of Beijing’s benign intentions.








John Chan
It is hard to understand this article. It starts with issues on China’s internal affair regarding rocky process of reunification between Taiwan and China. Then it jumps to the international issues between Japan and China. At the end the author superficially lumps two separate issues together and condemn China hegemonism using issues of China’s internal affair as a support of his conclusion of the article. Is the Diplomat a stepping stone for the author to get hired by one of those neo-cons institutions whose objective is to undermine China’s peaceful rise?
SE962582C
You would to agree that it is NOT THE JOB of and not the Duty of either the Author or of Mr MIKS to so-called quote “Help” and unquote any country or Nation State, including China, and China included.
Steve
@John, your nice words cannot deceive anyone. Taiwan is as much an internal affair of China as Canada is as internal affair of the UK. There can be no “reunification” because Taiwan was never ruled by the PRC for a single day. And most Taiwanese do not consider themselves “Chinese” anymore, anyway. Smart them.
Your plans are not “peaceful”. Please stop boring me.
typhoonq
@Steve,
Most countries in the World acknowledge Taiwan is part of China and there is no deny facts Taiwan has been ruled by China for centuries.
If most Taiwanese do not consider themselves as Chinese, I would suggest they should stop using Chinese names,stop speaking and writing Chinese and stop practising the Chinese culture.
You can deny Taiwan is not part of China, but if you start denying your own
roots and identity you are no better than a dog.
Johan Chang
Taiwan has not been ruled by China for centuries. If you actually bother to read a tiny amount of history, you will find that Taiwan’s history is a little more complicated than that. If you actually look it up, China officially annexed Taiwan only a few years before they handed it over to Japan. Before that, the Qing dynasty which by the way are Manchurian, not Han, only considered Taiwan to be an overseas territory that was explicitly not part of China. The Ming dynasty (when the Chinese ruled themselves before the Qing dynasty) did not substantively control Taiwan and did not consider Taiwan to be a part of China. The idea that Taiwan _is_ a part of China only dates from the 1950’s and it only exists because the losers of the Chinese Civil War retreated to the Island.
Don
Whenever representatives of the Communist Party of China — an organization that disgraces the human race with its track record of murder and deceit — claims that something is “China’s internal affairs”, we can be almost certain that the opposite is the case.
When someone points a gun at someone else and threatens to pull the trigger unless his orders are obeyed, we do not describe this as “peaceful” behaviour. When one country targets 1,500 missiles and the world’s largest military buildup of the past 30 years at a non-threatening neighbour, no one considers it an example of a “peaceful rise.”
Taiwanese voters gave the PRC the benefit of the doubt in 2008 when they voted in the CCP-favoured candidate as president. But the PRC’s recent tantrums and outright aggression have lowered people’s willingness to trust in China as a good faith negotiating partner. As the above article sensibly explains.
SE962582C
There rests and there lies the, THE, Ultimate Paradox.
Taiwan the Formosa (and/or) the (former) Republic of China is or are supposed to be both separate and Independent, as an Independent entity, Country and/or Nation State, or not, or else, yet the never-ending Obsession, positive and/or negative, with China the Socialist PRC, suggests something else and something different.
If the Taiwanese/Formosans are truly Separate and Independent, and THAT Separate and Independent, then why is all the obsession with China the Socialist PRC, a supposedly and/or an actual separate Foreign Power?
And by the way, it ought to be and should be instead be “You would [HAVE] to agree that … “.