Bo Xilai has a reputation as a rising political rock star. But do his ‘Red Culture’ policies in Chongqing really offer a viable model for China?
As China’s 2012 power transition approaches, politicians and academics are racing to find the theme that will define the country’s direction for the next eight years. The inclinations of Xi Jinping, heir apparent to the presidency, are still unclear, but his recent visit to Chongqing suggests that he’s taking a particular interest in the ‘Red Culture’ policies of municipal Party Secretary Bo Xilai.
Bo is the highest-ranking Party member of the Chongqing Municipal area, an administrative zone four times the size of the US state size of New Jersey. It embraces acity of 10 million, as well as a vast rural hinterland that contains more than 1,200 towns and villages. Over the past few years, Bo has made himself the centre of media attention with eye-catching initiatives such as a ‘red song’ campaign and a ban on advertisements on local TV.
But the significance of Chongqing runs much deeper than socialist gimmicks—Bo has tried to rewrite the social contract of Chongqing with an attack on economic inequality, an expansion of the state role in the economy, and political moves taken straight from Mao Zedong’s playbook.
People often say that politics in China have stood still while the economy has raced ahead. But the placid surface of single-party rule conceals vigorous debate within the Communist Party over China’s future. Policy experimentation at the local level provides fodder for arguments that will determine the shape of Chinese socialism during the next administration and beyond. The approach of the 2012 handover has spurred risings stars like Bo, a Politburo member and likely candidate for promotion to the top-rung Politburo Standing Committee, to jockey for top leaders’ attention with striking new policies.
This conversation doesn’t always move in liberal directions. China’s ‘New Left’ has seized upon Bo’s ideas to argue for a radical shift away from the market-oriented policies of the Reform and Opening period, citing Chongqing as proof that China can combine growth with economic equality in a vision of socialism that looks to a more statist past.
New Left proponents argue that Chongqing’s experience is the beginning of a path for China that will break radically with capitalist reforms begun by Deng Xiaoping.They hope to restore the state as the centre of China’s economic system with a focus on poverty reduction and to revive Maoist political techniques. In doing so, they claim to have a blueprint for a new era in China’s history.
Socialism 3.0
In a political system where slogans matter, coining a new buzzword is a delicate business, and Bo has been careful to tie himself to the history of the Communist Party. ‘Some people say that “Red Culture” is a move to the left,’ Bo said at a 2009 municipal party meeting. ‘In fact, it’s just about serving the people. That’s why the Communist Party was founded.’
Yet leading members of China’s New Left are beginning to look beyond the theme that has defined Chinese politics for the last 30 years.
Wang Shaoguang, a mainland-born professor of political science at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, has labelled this new period ‘Socialism 3.0’ in an unpublished article focusing on Chongqing, casting it as the successor Mao’s radical egalitarianism and Deng’s reform and opening.
Controversial Peking University political scientist Pan Wei, for his part, describes Chongqing as proof that China is moving into a ‘post-reform and opening era,’ returning to the traditional socialist focus on equality. Arguing that the growth-centred policies of recent decades have created an unacceptable gap between rich and poor, he says the time has come for a radical rethinking of Chinese politics—but he isn’t sure the time has come to say so publicly.
Photo Credit: Chen Hualin
View as Single Page
Reddit
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Technorati
Yahoo
Google
Plurk
Gems
Great Article.
I read a lot chinese Leftest articles. I must say that this is a fair article that reflect the political current scenarios. Currently, the Rightest are in power and has been in power since Deng Xiaoping. They have all the propogenda tools and political resources. However, 30 years has accumulated a lot of problems that they can not solve. The leftest only got this small playground now to express themselves.
One thing I felt good is that this shows that china now has this self correcting ability. With this ability, the sociaty can perfecting itself and move forward. After 3.0, there will be 4.0, 5.0 and so on
Haeckelist
Thank you for this insightful article on a very important topic. I heard about this new phenomenon in Chongqing in another major newspaper, which dismissed it as nostalgic red flag waving.
Wilsonian Don J.
Fascinating article– although I don’t see anything maoist about Bo’s approach. sounds like social democracy to me.
Ji shiyu
The officials will keep looking for ways to remain popular, so long as they and their families can keep living the priviledged lives they so cherish. Whatever social equality is achieved between rich and poor, it is clear who the rich are going to remain…those connected to the top level of everything. Still, Bo’s popularity could be useful…it is rare to see a Princeling who is also “popular” like the “populists”.
Ikke
I agree, very insightful article!
EAM
Good article. We know too little of the debates that occur within China and within the CCP and it is good to see some of those debates aired. When I talk to friends from China, I am always taken by how open and robust the debates are among them – but getting little airing in the wider world. Nothing is taboo. Ordinary Chinese I speak to sometimes make comparisons with the Mao era and say “He looked after us ordinary people, not like now” but are also alive to the benefits of the high growth model. I remeber one said of socialism “shi hui zhu yi hao bu hao” (“it is good and not good”). The only book in English that covers these kinds of debates within China is Mark Leonard’s “What does China think”. Does any one know any other sources?
Frank
Not really.
If you cannot read Chinese and Chinese historical books, you will never understand China.
EAM
I agree that you need to read Chinese if you want to be serious in knowing China – but you also need to go beyond the official version as with any other country. Similarly, to really know India, Hindi, Bengali, Gujarati, Tamil … is also required – depending on which part of India you are interested in. But there is still plenty in English about both countries (and most other countries). Yasheng Huang and Minqi Li both write in English about China and books that are worth reading, also giving some idea of the diversity of debate.