<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Seditious Ahmadinejad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-diplomat.com/2010/07/27/the-seditious-ahmadinejad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-diplomat.com/2010/07/27/the-seditious-ahmadinejad/</link>
	<description>Know The Diplomat, Know Asia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:55:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://the-diplomat.com/2010/07/27/the-seditious-ahmadinejad/comment-page-1/#comment-4537</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-diplomat.com/?p=5232#comment-4537</guid>
		<description>I think the issue at hand is not whether or not Iranian systems are a bad thing, but rather that the people should be given more say in what they want in their political system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the issue at hand is not whether or not Iranian systems are a bad thing, but rather that the people should be given more say in what they want in their political system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickie Wupdajock</title>
		<link>http://the-diplomat.com/2010/07/27/the-seditious-ahmadinejad/comment-page-1/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickie Wupdajock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-diplomat.com/?p=5232#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>Regime change in Iran is a &quot;dream&quot; in some circles in the West. However, is the above what Iran or the West really want?

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has been accused as being a lot of things by the West. In reality, he is nothing more than another moderate, reformist wannabe who wants to stamp his own personality on the presidency and wants to try to encourage social freedoms. When the hardliners and religious nuts began to see this, they turned on him. Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi is a very dangerous individual and so are militant groups like Hezbollah. If these got into power in Iran, all social changes maintained in Iran would be gone. Iran would be isolated by a government who wouldn&#039;t out of religious duties sell oil to non-&quot;Muslims&quot;. &quot;Islamic Voodooism&quot; would prevail and ALL the things the West says Ahmadinejad is but isn&#039;t would become a reality - only with Ahmadinejad not being the perpetrator. Ahmadinejad would be one more green movement opposition figure (joining former enemis Mousavi, Karroubi and Rafsanjani, just like Rafsanjani joined his former enemy Khatami).

Iran is not perfect as it is and needs a lot of democracy and needs more social freedoms. Khamenei may be corrupt, Ahmadinejad may be somewhat idealistic. BUT both are far preferable to an Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi-led kingdom in Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regime change in Iran is a &#8220;dream&#8221; in some circles in the West. However, is the above what Iran or the West really want?</p>
<p>Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has been accused as being a lot of things by the West. In reality, he is nothing more than another moderate, reformist wannabe who wants to stamp his own personality on the presidency and wants to try to encourage social freedoms. When the hardliners and religious nuts began to see this, they turned on him. Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi is a very dangerous individual and so are militant groups like Hezbollah. If these got into power in Iran, all social changes maintained in Iran would be gone. Iran would be isolated by a government who wouldn&#8217;t out of religious duties sell oil to non-&#8221;Muslims&#8221;. &#8220;Islamic Voodooism&#8221; would prevail and ALL the things the West says Ahmadinejad is but isn&#8217;t would become a reality &#8211; only with Ahmadinejad not being the perpetrator. Ahmadinejad would be one more green movement opposition figure (joining former enemis Mousavi, Karroubi and Rafsanjani, just like Rafsanjani joined his former enemy Khatami).</p>
<p>Iran is not perfect as it is and needs a lot of democracy and needs more social freedoms. Khamenei may be corrupt, Ahmadinejad may be somewhat idealistic. BUT both are far preferable to an Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi-led kingdom in Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://the-diplomat.com/2010/07/27/the-seditious-ahmadinejad/comment-page-1/#comment-4448</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 04:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-diplomat.com/?p=5232#comment-4448</guid>
		<description>And this has WHAT to do with the contents of the article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this has WHAT to do with the contents of the article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Talut</title>
		<link>http://the-diplomat.com/2010/07/27/the-seditious-ahmadinejad/comment-page-1/#comment-4251</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Talut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-diplomat.com/?p=5232#comment-4251</guid>
		<description>No need of those comments/rights that are only to create chaos and conflicts in human society. Reformations are OK but they never should cross the limit of decency and courtesy of Mankind. Iran is still a peaceful country and satisfied with its own systems. They are harming none. Why the westerns are so crazy to see the Iranians girls naked like they do to their own mothers and sisters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No need of those comments/rights that are only to create chaos and conflicts in human society. Reformations are OK but they never should cross the limit of decency and courtesy of Mankind. Iran is still a peaceful country and satisfied with its own systems. They are harming none. Why the westerns are so crazy to see the Iranians girls naked like they do to their own mothers and sisters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

