Comments on: The History of Sino-India Tensions http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions/ Know The Diplomat, Know Asia Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:18:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha By: Rishabh http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions/comment-page-1/#comment-19222 Rishabh Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:40:04 +0000 http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions#comment-19222 India is a secular democracy and the "foreign white Italian lady" is not Italian anymore, she is a naturalized Indian citizen. And as an Indian citizen she has the rights to contest elections, exactly as Arnie did in California, even though he was Austrian by birth. We dont all need to be homogeneous to succeed as a country. In my opinion what is despicable is the way China is trying to increase the influx of Han Chinese to places of debate such as Xianjiang and Tibet. And she may be the most powerful lady in India, but she in no ways runs the government, if you had any idea how the constitution of India works, you would realise for one person to run the government is largely impossible as you would need a spread consensus of at least 10. The closest any one did come to run the government was Indira Gandhi and even she had to resort to an "Emergency" to maintain her control. India and China are both fascinating ancient countries, that are making their step into the big game. Wherein China has the vision and India has the right method. Both can learn from each other and when both stop seeing each other as threats, both will learn that growing simultaneously is beneficial for all. But, all this depends on who is the next man incharge in China, who after Hu? India is a secular democracy and the “foreign white Italian lady” is not Italian anymore, she is a naturalized Indian citizen. And as an Indian citizen she has the rights to contest elections, exactly as Arnie did in California, even though he was Austrian by birth. We dont all need to be homogeneous to succeed as a country. In my opinion what is despicable is the way China is trying to increase the influx of Han Chinese to places of debate such as Xianjiang and Tibet. And she may be the most powerful lady in India, but she in no ways runs the government, if you had any idea how the constitution of India works, you would realise for one person to run the government is largely impossible as you would need a spread consensus of at least 10. The closest any one did come to run the government was Indira Gandhi and even she had to resort to an “Emergency” to maintain her control. India and China are both fascinating ancient countries, that are making their step into the big game. Wherein China has the vision and India has the right method. Both can learn from each other and when both stop seeing each other as threats, both will learn that growing simultaneously is beneficial for all. But, all this depends on who is the next man incharge in China, who after Hu?

]]> By: Laticia http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions/comment-page-1/#comment-18367 Laticia Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:49:49 +0000 http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions#comment-18367 So that's the case? Quite a rveeltiaon that is. So that’s the case? Quite a rveeltiaon that is.

]]> By: Siddharth http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions/comment-page-1/#comment-14053 Siddharth Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:26:00 +0000 http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions#comment-14053 South Asia is a new term coined by Chinese out of frustration (typical Chinese slave mentality) It never existed before the year 2000. People in Arunachal Pradesh are Hindus and Indians. They are neither the Buddhists nor the Tibetans. South Asia is a new term coined by Chinese out of frustration (typical Chinese slave mentality) It never existed before the year 2000.
People in Arunachal Pradesh are Hindus and Indians. They are neither the Buddhists nor the Tibetans.

]]> By: Indian Maverick http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions/comment-page-1/#comment-9086 Indian Maverick Sun, 06 Feb 2011 06:05:29 +0000 http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions#comment-9086 @ Frank The way of Tibets issue should be for china to give back Tibet to its own people and withdraw from Tibet, so as for all territorial disputes to be dissolved and be at peace once again. That way, there will never be a territory dispute for china, with india and others. If china wants peace with its neighbours, that is the way to go. @ Frank
The way of Tibets issue should be for china to give back Tibet to its own people and withdraw from Tibet, so as for all territorial disputes to be dissolved and be at peace once again.
That way, there will never be a territory dispute for china, with india and others.
If china wants peace with its neighbours, that is the way to go.

]]> By: Michael http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions/comment-page-1/#comment-8643 Michael Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:50:12 +0000 http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions#comment-8643 Don Yes, of course, the day the West gives the land back to the Aboriginals, the Native Indians, Hawaiians and many other countries! Don

Yes, of course, the day the West gives the land back to the Aboriginals, the Native Indians, Hawaiians and many other countries!

]]> By: Michael http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions/comment-page-1/#comment-8642 Michael Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:47:14 +0000 http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions#comment-8642 "Nehru and his team were mere quislings who pretended to be independent but were actually bound almost as firmly to the apron strings of Europe and the United States as they were when still a colony" And the truth shall set you free! The truth is that India never was given complete freedom and independence from their colonial masters, simply a little more management duties! Don't Indians ever question why the most powerful person in India today is an FOREIGN WHITE ITALIAN WOMAN whose only connection to India is her late husbands last name of Gandhi??? Do you see any where else in this world, be it Afica, South America, the Middle East, or Asia where there is a White person running the government??? India is still a slave country and nothing will change this fact! “Nehru and his team were mere quislings who pretended to be independent but were actually bound almost as firmly to the apron strings of Europe and the United States as they were when still a colony”

And the truth shall set you free! The truth is that India never was given complete freedom and independence from their colonial masters, simply a little more management duties! Don’t Indians ever question why the most powerful person in India today is an FOREIGN WHITE ITALIAN WOMAN whose only connection to India is her late husbands last name of Gandhi??? Do you see any where else in this world, be it Afica, South America, the Middle East, or Asia where there is a White person running the government??? India is still a slave country and nothing will change this fact!

]]> By: Justin http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions/comment-page-1/#comment-6149 Justin Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:24:36 +0000 http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions#comment-6149 Thought about subscribing to the RSS feed then I saw the same old delusional Indian myth of being offered a UNSC seat. Doesn't speak well for any paper that will publish this. Reminds me of how one of India's minister recently cited the facts from an email chain letter about NASA's engineers being composed of 1/4 of Indians. Thought about subscribing to the RSS feed then I saw the same old delusional Indian myth of being offered a UNSC seat.

Doesn’t speak well for any paper that will publish this. Reminds me of how one of India’s minister recently cited the facts from an email chain letter about NASA’s engineers being composed of 1/4 of Indians.

]]> By: Don http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions/comment-page-1/#comment-5059 Don Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:16:30 +0000 http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions#comment-5059 Both China and India should give up North Tibet and South Tibet and restore Tibet as an independent nation as it existed before the Chinese invasion/annexation in the 50s. Dalai Lama and Tibetans would certainly take that and establish a fine demilitarized democracy as a buffer between two giant nuclear rivals. Let there be peace in the 21st century. Both China and India should give up North Tibet and South Tibet and restore Tibet as an independent nation as it existed before the Chinese invasion/annexation in the 50s. Dalai Lama and Tibetans would certainly take that and establish a fine demilitarized democracy as a buffer between two giant nuclear rivals. Let there be peace in the 21st century.

]]> By: Frank http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1095 Frank Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:49:02 +0000 http://the-diplomat.com/2009/12/01/the-history-of-sino-india-tensions#comment-1095 China, India and Tibet problem can be solved easily by letting the disputed territory south of the McMahon Line in South Tibet declare independence. South Tibet is currently under India control. The people in South Tibet are Tibetans. They are not going to be happy under India’s control. Sooner or later they will be a problem of India. China is also claiming South Tibet. So, if India lets South Tibet go. Give it back to Dalai Lama and his people!!! Since China did not lose anything, China will agree. All territory related problems are resolved. China, India and Tibet problem can be solved easily by letting the disputed territory south of the McMahon Line in South Tibet declare independence.

South Tibet is currently under India control. The people in South Tibet are Tibetans. They are not going to be happy under India’s control. Sooner or later they will be a problem of India.

China is also claiming South Tibet.

So, if India lets South Tibet go. Give it back to Dalai Lama and his people!!!

Since China did not lose anything, China will agree. All territory related problems are resolved.

]]>